Credit unions in BC are sprinting to the altar like mad these days, trying to differentiate their brands in the financial services landscape. But a proposed merger between two big suburban Vancouver credit unions has been called off. Apparently, the dating that's been going on for several months convinced the two that any marriage between them would end up as a constant battle over style.

I'll say.
There are similarities that probably created the dating discussions in the first place. Abbotsford-based Prospera Credit Union works the eastern suburbs of Vancouver and extends all the way to Kelowna. North Shore Credit Union works the – you guessed it – north shore of Burrard Inlet and Howe Sound.
But while they're similar in terms of operating in burbs, they are in reality unlike as you can get in terms of style and approach.
Prospera – Prospera, live long and prosper, get it? -- is an aggressive marketer that often uses its own branding as a marketing technique in itself. It likes to let the world know about its clever marketing, usually manifested in a blizzard of excited press releases.
Who could forget the introduction of “personal concierge” services, one of the “rock star amenities” it offered to shoppers in the South Granville area in Vancouver when it made its first foray into the city? It used last Valentine's day as a lever to start an “edgy” ad campaign urging people to “break up with your bank”. The pitch, obviously aimed at women, featured a “sad looking broken piggy bank named 'Hank',” and the headline “She broke up with me.”
Meanwhile, NSCU relies on basic business principles to expand. It has a quiet and solid business plan that concentrates on the growing North-shore corridor that extends all the way to Whistler. Pretty good spot to be in, what with the Olympics coming and all.
NSCU – yep the name's pretty functional in a world full of ad agency-generated brands-- takes its style approach from its CEO, Chris Catliff, who was supposed to lead the merged credit union. One of the top financial services chiefs in the country, Catliff is a strategist who eschews the Gee Whiz marketing approach. He's old fashioned enough to think that service value matters, and modern enough to understand the innate sophistication and lifestyles of his primarily middle to upper class market.
NSCU's press releases are few, and generally simple and informational. Donations to its community. Awards for its IT innovation. Appointments in key positions. Annual reports. Stuff that supports its brand as a no-nonsense competent provider of financial services.
So what would this marriage have been like? They're about equal in financial capability --Prospera has $2.3 billion in assets, and
Think of a brash young Surrey nightclubber who lives for today marrying a North Vancouver manager who's into health and growing the retirement account.
It would have been a constant battle of the brands. And a living hell for both.
Read Tony's previous blog here.
Read Tony's next entry here.
Do you agree? Disagree? Use the comment form below and tell Tony what you think!
Comments
To lazy article, no
By timax, April 4, 2008 at 04:13To lazy article, no background: I found this article informative no matter what!
Good read really.
Buy Viagra and Cialis Online
For men, to buy viagra is like to drink water as many men buy and take viagra like crazy. Just take a look at this picture of viagra buyers and find out more viagra reviews before you buy viagra and mabe you'll find out that cialis is better for you and your health.
Right on the money! Surrey
By Anonymous, November 2, 2007 at 17:04Right on the money! Surrey and Whistler never have mixed very well.
Whistler
NSCU member
I think Credit Unions in
By Anonymous, November 2, 2007 at 16:02I think Credit Unions in general have a brand problem. They're seen to be behind the times and not as forward thinking as banks, nor are they perceived to have the same range of services for the most part. And to varying extents these perceptions are correct.
Even the forward-thinking ones with decent brands, like North Shore Credit Union, unfortunately suffer from being tarred with the dowdy credit union brand brush. Credit Union Central has tried to remedy this with their TV ads, but in my opinion have missed the mark with shallow messaging. Credit Unions are actually not shallow - I know because I worked for one. Then take Coast Capital's TV ads. Personally, I think those give their brand a bad rap. One it doesn't actually deserve.
Your article was about two very different brands merging - and they absolutely are two very different brands. However, you seem to compare Prospera's brand with North Shore Credit Union's business strategy (though the two should ideally align and perhaps that's your premise). Prospera has an ill-defined brand. If a brand is meant to convey who you are, it's impossible to know who Prospera is. North Shore Credit Union's brand is clearer by far - it supports living the West Coast lifestyle - and is pretty consistent in demonstrating that. It would have totally flawed me from a brand perspective if the two had merged. Prospera would have done well to lose it's undefined brand and possibly gain something that clarified who it was. But what about North Shore Credit Union? Given how it so closely identities itself with the North Shore, where would it go with its brand story to its members when it has been claiming that it understands the North Shore life style? It would have to redefine itself to be relevant to a broader audience, but in such a way as to let it's existing base know that it still understands their lifestyle needs and aspirations. A tough balancing act.
Thanks professor! Does this
By Anonymous, October 27, 2007 at 15:33Thanks professor! Does this mean I get a D?
It's a blog, not an article. Which means it's a short burst of commentary. Look it up.
It was a musing on differing corporate cultures as evidenced by their marketing, not an MBA thesis on financial or business models. Since you appear to see that as "superficial analysis," I suspect you're one of those boring data nuts who believe that how people think, act, or interact is somehow inferior to "real" thinking -- like yours.
No wonder anonymous critics are held in such low regard.
The "author" Tony Wanless
lazy article, no background
By Anonymous, October 26, 2007 at 09:00lazy article, no background work done, superficial analysis - does the 'author' really suggest that branding is the ultimate way to judge whether a merger is going to work? no wonder journalists are held in such low regard
Anonymous comments are welcome, but they must first go to an approval queue. Register here to join our online community, and then login to start posting immediately.