Andrew Findlay | Image: Patrice Halley | Published: February 26, 2008

Chain gang

Print this article Email this article Share this article Text sizetext sizetext sizetext size
chaingang_1.jpg

I’m peering over my handlebars down the precipitous southwest flank of Idaho Peak at one of B.C.’s raw resources. Wind ripples the surface of Slocan Lake far below, and the granite ramparts of the Valhalla Range beyond form spiky silhouettes in the late afternoon sun.

I ponder the steep, twisting descent of Wakefield Trail that lies ahead. It’s as though somebody had demarcated the trail by simply painting an arbitrary line on a map irrespective of the mountain’s topography. Just the thought of falling off the edge of this skinny strip of dirt is enough to make the palms clammy.

The raw resource I’m talking about isn’t the type we dig from the ground or the sort we harvest into logs for the lumber mill. Rather, it’s the kind on which we pedal our bikes, scare ourselves silly like oversized children, and get our hearts pumping like James Brown midway through an extended version of “Sex Machine.”

It’s the natural, rugged terrain essential for mountain biking, and B.C., with its diverse topography and dedicated riding community that has turned trail-building into an art, is a veritable gold mine of opportunities for this adventure sport.

Though mountain biking wasn’t invented in B.C. – its roots can be traced back to the late 1970s and early ’80s in Marin County, California – it’s safe to say that the sport shed its pimply adolescent face and truly came of age here in its various incarnations of cross country, lift-accessed downhill and free-riding.

“North Shore” is no longer just the name of a Vancouver suburb; the term has evolved into an adjective employed by magazines from around the globe to describe a trickster’s style of mountain biking that involves steep descents loaded with man-made structures – a genre of riding that was pioneered on the slopes of Cypress, Seymour and Fromme, near Grouse.

Now that B.C. has a well-established cachet and credentials in the global mountain-biking community, its aficionados here at home want a little more respect from the powers that be. And it seems, with the provincial government developing new policy around riding and building trails on Crown land, mountain bikers may indeed be close to truly shedding their status as the unwanted

stepchild, an afterthought to the ski industry.

So last summer, when I received the invite from Mike Brcic, owner of Fernie-based Sacred Rides Mountain Bike Holidays Ltd., to join him and a handful of other riders on a 12-day odyssey across the province, it took me all of about two seconds to reply. Somehow I would find a way to pencil this adventure into my day planner.

Up until now, my idea of a mountain-bike road trip invariably involved sleeping in vans, usually with other sweaty males, and surviving on rations of canned beans and cheap beer. Brcic’s trip was to be a prototype of a tour he planned to offer his clients: hard riding by day, fine dining and luxury accommodation by night. It was also an opportu­nity to take the pulse of this exciting, adrenaline-charged pursuit and meet some of the players who are working hard to carve out a more prominent niche for mountain biking in the province’s tourism spectrum.

Day six of the tour had brought us here to the Wakefield Trail in the heart of the Kootenays – an old miners’ path turned Kootenay biking classic. I was quickly realizing that Brcic knows how to have fun on a bike. Since starting Sacred Rides on a shoestring back in 1997, the 36-year-old entrepreneur has expanded his repertoire of tours beyond B.C. to include exotic forays into Chile and Peru.

However, Brcic is inevitably drawn back to the mountain-biking nirvana of B.C., and the fact he’s planning on offering such a posh mountain-biking experience suggests the sport’s disciples have pedalled a long way in terms of buying power. (One of these 11-day luxury tours would set you back $3,995.) Yet Brcic and others involved in selling mountain biking believe the province could do a lot more to capitalize on its off-road riding resources.


Comments

I see the NIMBY anti

By Anonymous, March 26, 2008 at 22:27

I see the NIMBY anti everything croud has found your article John.

Actually, the author of the

By jbucher, March 27, 2008 at 09:40

Actually, the author of the piece is Andrew Findlay, and, below, he's responded to some of the interesting chatter on the board here.

John Bucher
Editor, BCBusiness Online

As a long time mountain

By Andrew Findlay, March 26, 2008 at 22:25

As a long time mountain biker I have seen the sport evolve from a rather obscure pastime to a mainstream pursuit. And yes, along with this growth has also come a proliferation of illegal trail building and subsequent user conflicts and negative environmental impacts from erosion, tree-cutting, etc.. I agree with the reader comments above that this is indeed a downside of the sport and my article was not intended gloss over this fact. However I have also witnessed impressive efforts throughout B.C. to create well built and maintained trails - Shuswap Hut and Trail Alliance in Salmon Arm and Seven Summits in Rossland to name a couple - that have both the support of government agencies and the local biking and hiking community.

Like it or not, mountain biking is here to stay and any effort to legitimize trails and raise the bar for construction and maintenance can only bode well for the future of the sport. As the folks in Salmon Arm who see mountain biking as a way to diversify their tourism economy might say, you could sit around for decades and bemoan the raw resource economy waiting for nature to repair the impacts of clear cut logging. Or, you can do something creative and build a monumental, lasting recreation corridor that hikers, bikers and horsepeople can enjoy together. Who knows - you might even attract a few active minded tourists to spend some dollars in your town? If you are philosopically, or otherwise, opposed to mountain biking then prepare to be disappointed if you choose to hike along a trail built and used by bikers.

Andrew Findlay
author

I live on the front lines of

By Anonymous, March 26, 2008 at 11:28

I live on the front lines of mountain biking, John. Why should I have to move away from those who chose to "squat" on public forest land, building illegal trail structures and ride like imbeciles? So you see, it is not so easy for me to get away from the mountain bikers. I can see through the mountain bike "spin" and take it apart piece by piece. Your "eco"-tourism piece on mountain biking has fallen for the usual mountain bike propaganda.

Whistler is crap since the bikers invaded it. One friend who lives there tells me the ambulances go up and down the hills, like yo-yo's, rescuing bikers from themselves. Sirens and the "call of the wild" wheeled yokels is not making Whistler an attractive place to visit during the "off-season", anymore.

To further distance themselves from nature, Whistler has brought in more "eco"-tourism in the form of ATV's and ORV's. How bright is that? It is clearly nurturing "nature-deficiency" and will become the death knell for conservation. What we lose, ecologically, is priceless. It cannot be measured in terms of revenue brought in by such off-road "eco"-tourism. It is plain common sense. Thus there are no real economical gains to be made by such destructive recreational activities inside our remaining wild and semi-wild places.

Mountain biking is not somewhat benign because it does not use a motor! IMBA has recently aligned itself with the motorized off-road recreational coalitions in order to have more clout to defeat wilderness legislation. The ongoing transformation from recreation into "wreckreation" should become a concern, not a celebration!

Do your own research . I did!

Very fine comment,

By jbucher, March 26, 2008 at 12:41

Very fine comment, Anon.—thanks!

John Bucher
Editor, BCBusiness Online

Thanks, John. My other

By Anonymous, March 25, 2008 at 14:53

Thanks, John. My other comment was a play on, "Can't see the forest for the trees". How else can one describe a hike around a myriad of wooden jump structures, wall rides, teeter-totters, among many other invasive and ecologically damaging mountain bike trail structures built inside many BC forests. I'm not sure if I am speaking hyperbolically, or not.

Thanks, Anon.—I reckoned

By jbucher, March 25, 2008 at 15:45

Thanks, Anon.—I reckoned it was a "forest for the trees" analogy. And I suppose that idea could hold up if you were standing in the middle of a terrain park, bikers leaping over you, while you strained to catch sight of the wilderness beyond... Are the bikers that difficult to get away from?

John Bucher
Editor, BCBusiness Online

I have to agree with

By Anonymous, March 25, 2008 at 13:15

I have to agree with Anonymous. People who love nature want to experience NATURE. It only takes one mountain bike, ghetto blaster (that's a radio/tape recorder/CD player, for you Canadians), or human-built structure to destroy the experience of nature. Or do you LIKE finding a fly in your salad?

I've been to Victoria and Vancouver (and seen the destruction of nature perpetrated by the mountain bikers) and other places in southern BC, but I see no reason to ever go back to BC, considering the fact that you support this insanity.

Mike Vandeman

I hear where you're coming

By jbucher, March 25, 2008 at 14:24

I hear where you're coming from, Mike, but could you give us a clearer idea of what "experiencing NATURE" means? Whose experience is preserved, and whose destroyed?

More to the point, what human activities are permitted or proscribed in your vision of things?

John Bucher
Editor, BCBusiness Online

Why is the BC Business

By Anonymous, March 25, 2008 at 12:11

Why is the BC Business Magazine glorifiying eco-vandalism and environmental thuggery inside our disappearing natural places? There is no merit to the kind of "North Shore" style mountain biking that does not wish any taming or containment. We can't see the forests anymore, for the eyesore mountain bike structures. This is progress? You might as well write about pot grow-ops as being equally of economical merit. Show some responsibility , BC Mag. Stop being like sheep, glorifying this wayward wheeled wreckreation in our midst. There is no economical benefits to riding and building roughshod over our wild and semi-wilderness areas. You just do not "get it!"

Thanks for the comment. I

By jbucher, March 25, 2008 at 12:34

Thanks for the comment. I don't know many mountain bikers, but I have to think you're speaking hyperbolically when you say we can't see the trees for the structures. Really?

Top marks for "wayward wheeled wreckreation," though—pure alliterative genius!

John Bucher
Editor, BCBusiness Online


Anonymous comments are welcome, but they must first go to an approval queue. Register here to join our online community, and then login to start posting immediately.